Friday, 2 September 2016

Identity and Its Own

In the 21st century we are offered a myriad of choices when it comes to how we define ourselves within our communities, both macro and micro. In the face of global capitalism, men and women of today are employed and used sheerly for profit-making. The generation-spanning farmer is replaced by the foreign labour-employing factory farm. The local mason is replaced by cheap, mass produced carpentry and community-college trained craftsmen using subpar materials. Local entertainers are replaced by MTV-type media hubs.

It is easy to see the new paradigm being established – people are disconnected from the place they live; the actual environment they exist in becomes not a land to be proud of and take part in, but a prison that one seeks to escape from. Especially in the case of small towns, when compared to the bombastic image of city life that Globalist media presents, rural folk are often presented as being 'bigoted', of 'old values', while the towns themselves are further extensions of 'oldness'. The internet allows members of these societies to feel apart from the places they live – for instance, a homosexual can find solace in a message board with thousands of people like him all over the world, while back at home there is no one like him and he is excluded because of it. By diverting focus from assimilation and communal responsibility, people effectively become conduits for negative memes.

It is no coincidence that small town America, with its patriotism, 'racism', and nationalist value scheme is a target for Globalist media. As these pockets of community are typically 'disconnected' from the more urbanized and Globalist media-soaked sections of America, they hold more tightly onto values that are traditional and healthy. It is also no coincidence that the autonomy South was brought millions of slaves, and also challenged by the Federal Government during the Civil War. This paradigm will be expended upon later, with the main idea being this: The problem the Globalists identified with the South was its tendency for self-governance, autonomy, militarism and nationalism. Thus, this society had to be weakened – so black slaves were introduced. Through social and racial degradation, like a pox, this problem minority blossomed into the fifth column epidemic we have been seeing since the end of the Civil War. As it stands, blacks (along with other identity groups) have been memed into becoming accelerators of Globalism and a foil to small town American culture.

This is the basic formula for how Identity is used to subvert the target State-Civilization and begin to deconstruct it. As the amount of possible identities not related directly to functional communal duties expanded in range, this allows for digression in usefulness which leads to depression and separation. This is how non-white identity, homosexuality (or any digression from normal sexuality), transsexualism, feminism and any other meme identity can exist. These people go from necessarily being productive and functioning members of society to acting moreso as a disease vector. Recent experimentation done by the US military's Minerva Institute illuminated the concept that ideas spread much in the same way as infectious diseases do. Because these new identities fall in opposition to the values held by the host communities, the hosts reject the negative memes.

As Leon Trotsky coined the term 'racism', it becomes easy to see what the function of the idea of 'racism' becomes in the context I have provided as well as its original context in Marxist dialectic – it is a word meant to deflect confrontation of Globalism and European values. Nietzsche and Hegel would describe the Globalist moral paradigm as being burdened with an excess of slave morality, that is, focusing on values like compassion, kindness and subservience. This is easily seen reflected in the way that the Globalist media chooses to argue against the host community's rejection of its implanted memes – a person advocating for racial-cultural homogeneity or any sort of nationalism becomes a “racist”. A person espousing the view that the mass-media's constant subjecting us to homosexuality and other sexual perversions might be negative becomes a 'bigot'. The list goes on and on because it has been preordained – any argument you have that lies in opposition to Globalism places you as a criminal. In this arena, the weight of an argument's logic has no sway. To use race as an example, all arguments concerning anything to do with race are preceded by the established Globalist lie that “race is a social construct”. This acts as a sort of “checker” before any debate – one cannot argue anything concerning race because this checker exists to stop that before it happens. The debate cannot take place because the Global community takes this as a given fact – it is in fact a meme.

As modern society has set up a glorious wonderland of potential addictions for us, whether it be music, drugs or media, nothing riles up the average person more than another person disrupting their re-upping of addiction/pleasure center chemical levels. This is the phenomenon known as virtue signaling – in the same way that a crack addict will not jeopardize his next potential hit in any way, an average person will shriek down any dissent that could potentially create unrest and disrupt their next 'hit' of comfort and acceptance by their peers. The reader may recall a time when, at the dinner table, they professed an 'unpopular opinion' that they knew was true, yet were told to shut up when it became 'offensive' – in every case, this is because the topic being discussed was against Globalism. Because the cultural norms around the table are now defined by the mass-media's Globalist morality, the anti-Globalist is a bigot and a racist.

Free Will and Memes

In the heart of all peoples on Earth is the desire to be free. It rages in us; an imperative that cannot be ignored. This is the most powerful tool of the individual, for it allows him the will to seize his destiny for himself. The foremost objective and desire of the animal is to survive, but man has the rare ability to want to be free. Although Biblical allegories here are obvious, I would say that my more ideal Eve would have immediately killed the sly-talking Snake in the Tree of Knowledge for being an obvious subverter in the Garden of Eden. His need for rhetoric revealed his dishonesty. Eve then would have happily eaten from the tree of knowledge until she could get at the charlatan pretending to be God that wrote the story in the first place.

It is seen frequently in our society today, with most aspects of pop culture being based on some form of 'liberation'. Whether it be the sexual revolution of the 60's, the social justice movement of the turn of the 21st century, or any number of political movements be they Marxist or Fascist. It is by manipulating the innate human characteristic of wanting to be free that we are unequivocally controlled. For this purpose there are endless distractions – music and film in the form of rebellion, a myriad of ideological positions to set yourself apart from those around you, business opportunities to make you rich. The problem is apparent – man cannot be free if he does not know what he truly values.

 I will sum it up succinctly: freedom is that which Man generally feels comfortable doing while he is completely free of all rhetoric, all ideology and all negative influence. His actions then are based on true necessity. Why should anything that is true need to be fluffed up by any sort of rhetorical infrastructure? Has humanity has not lasted this long without feeling the need to attach ourselves to these ephemeral metaphysical truisms that only seem to divide us? The fact is that humans act in their most natural and peaceful capacities when their minds are not poisoned by what we now know as memes. Revered in ancient times, prophecized and elucidated by Stirner in the 20th century and propelled to the mainstream by Dawkins in the 21st, the meme is the ultimate weapon used against the human mind. The automatic transference of useless, toxic and corrupted information via the media has become the paramount problem facing humanity in its lifetime. 

An Introduction and a Starting Point

“All truth passes through three stages. First, it is ridiculed. Second, it is violently opposed. Third, it is accepted as being self-evident.” - Arthur Schopenhauer

This blog is written out of necessity. It is neither reactionary nor revolutionary. It is meant to be a reminder. It is meant not to enlighten, but to jog the memory. It is not rhetorical, for as the reader will see it needs little argument. It is meant to be a review of that which makes us human.

The person reading this blog should be someone who sees something wrong in most things to do with the modern world. They are someone whose peers would describe as a skeptic, a contrarian, or even a 'devil'. They find themselves in opposition to most commonly held opinions of the modern masses; instead they find their moral and even some cultural/everyday norms being placed not in today's times but the traditions of Ancient Rome or the Medieval Age. They are someone who wants to see the people of the world accelerate for the better – not through the lie of progression, the breaking of social taboos or the self-fulfillment of capitalism, but through a reclamation of values.

Despite all this, the reader should also not be someone who thinks themselves better or worse than their fellow countrymen. They should not be someone who inherits the ideas of their teachers and peers but instead makes the most objective possible decisions for themselves – for this they will find themselves shunned should they speak too loudly on it, or jailed if they truly reveal themselves. They should not be someone who disrespects the material foundations laid upon this world by science – but at the same time is skeptical of the hegemonic lordship of Science over knowledge, both in its esoterica and sheer physical unavailability. Finally, this blog must be read by someone who recognizes the strength and nobility of the Eagle, and realizes he is no different from it. This is a Statesman's manual. It is not a thing for the disturber, the agitator, the subverter or the revolutionary. The ideas laid out here are deemed to be based in natural law, that which has and always will be true, and of the direct providence of nature. Here I present the politic as body; the reader as a white blood cell forming from the abyss to be harnessed by the will of these words, and of nature itself. A sense of purpose will be instilled that has transcended all before it – the true desire for peace. It will protect the body and defend it from disease in all forms.

The title of this blog refers to our maxim and purpose in life: to establish a philosophy for the autonomy and sovereignty of every nation and race on Earth, with the will to march forward and maintain the environment at all costs. The man for all time is the man who is willing to put himself at the forefront of this movement. It is not meant to be a sheer reaction to the problems the modern world presents us. The ignition of nobility shall be apparent in the heart, mind and soul of the man who takes upon himself the preservation of his tradition and race, for he has in this realization melded the purpose of his lower, subconscious and conscious selves – perhaps even transcending these states to become something of a Hero.

The reader should take pride herein these pages, for he will find that which he has known all along to be revealed true. These words are eternally humming, reverberating in the very spirit of the reader himself. Do not be convinced or swayed by anything said here. If you are a person of logic and reason, these ideas will reverberate within your very soul and need no flowery language or lengthy reasoning to be accepted as the truth.

As I said, I intend this blog to be a manual. Take from it and apply it to your life. It will allow you to be free.