In the 21st century we are
offered a myriad of choices when it comes to how we define ourselves
within our communities, both macro and micro. In the face of global
capitalism, men and women of today are employed and used sheerly for
profit-making. The generation-spanning farmer is replaced by the
foreign labour-employing factory farm. The local mason is replaced by
cheap, mass produced carpentry and community-college trained
craftsmen using subpar materials. Local entertainers are replaced by
MTV-type media hubs.
It is easy to see the new paradigm
being established – people are disconnected from the place they
live; the actual environment they exist in becomes not a land to be
proud of and take part in, but a prison that one seeks to escape
from. Especially in the case of small towns, when compared to the
bombastic image of city life that Globalist media presents, rural
folk are often presented as being 'bigoted', of 'old values', while
the towns themselves are further extensions of 'oldness'. The
internet allows members of these societies to feel apart from the
places they live – for instance, a homosexual can find solace in a
message board with thousands of people like him all over the world,
while back at home there is no one like him and he is excluded
because of it. By diverting focus from assimilation and communal
responsibility, people effectively become conduits for negative
memes.
It is no coincidence that small town
America, with its patriotism, 'racism', and nationalist value scheme
is a target for Globalist media. As these pockets of community are
typically 'disconnected' from the more urbanized and Globalist
media-soaked sections of America, they hold more tightly onto values
that are traditional and healthy. It is also no coincidence that the
autonomy South was brought millions of slaves, and also challenged by
the Federal Government during the Civil War. This paradigm will be
expended upon later, with the main idea being this: The problem the
Globalists identified with the South was its tendency for
self-governance, autonomy, militarism and nationalism. Thus, this
society had to be weakened – so black slaves were introduced.
Through social and racial degradation, like a pox, this problem
minority blossomed into the fifth column epidemic we have been seeing
since the end of the Civil War. As it stands, blacks (along with
other identity groups) have been memed into
becoming accelerators of Globalism and a foil to small town American
culture.
This
is the basic formula for how Identity is used to subvert the target
State-Civilization and begin to deconstruct it. As the amount of
possible identities not related directly to functional communal
duties expanded in range, this allows for digression in usefulness
which leads to depression and separation. This is how non-white
identity, homosexuality (or any digression from normal sexuality),
transsexualism, feminism and any other meme identity can
exist. These people go from necessarily being productive and
functioning members of society to acting moreso as a disease vector.
Recent experimentation done by the US military's Minerva Institute
illuminated the concept that ideas spread much in the same way as
infectious diseases do. Because these new identities fall in
opposition to the values held by the host communities, the hosts
reject the negative memes.
As
Leon Trotsky coined the term 'racism', it becomes easy to see what
the function of the idea of 'racism' becomes in the context I have
provided as well as its original context in Marxist dialectic – it
is a word meant to deflect confrontation of Globalism and European
values. Nietzsche and Hegel would describe the Globalist moral
paradigm as being burdened with an excess of slave morality, that is,
focusing on values like compassion, kindness and subservience. This
is easily seen reflected in the way that the Globalist media chooses
to argue against the host community's rejection of its implanted
memes – a person advocating for racial-cultural homogeneity or any
sort of nationalism becomes a “racist”. A person espousing the
view that the mass-media's constant subjecting us to homosexuality
and other sexual perversions might be negative becomes a 'bigot'. The
list goes on and on because it has been preordained – any argument
you have that lies in opposition to Globalism places you as a
criminal. In this arena, the weight of an argument's logic has no
sway. To use race as an example, all arguments concerning anything to
do with race are preceded by the established Globalist lie that “race
is a social construct”. This acts as a sort of “checker” before
any debate – one cannot argue anything concerning race because this
checker exists to stop that before it happens. The debate cannot take
place because the Global community takes this as a given fact – it
is in fact a meme.
As
modern society has set up a glorious wonderland of potential
addictions for us, whether it be music, drugs or media, nothing riles
up the average person more than another person disrupting their
re-upping of addiction/pleasure center chemical levels. This is the
phenomenon known as virtue signaling – in the same way that a crack
addict will not jeopardize his next potential hit in any way, an
average person will shriek down any dissent that could potentially
create unrest and disrupt their next 'hit' of comfort and acceptance
by their peers. The reader may recall a time when, at the dinner
table, they professed an 'unpopular opinion' that they knew was true,
yet were told to shut up when it became 'offensive' – in every
case, this is because the topic being discussed was against
Globalism. Because the cultural
norms around the table are now defined by the mass-media's Globalist
morality, the anti-Globalist is
a bigot and a racist.